Elysium

Ok, it's actually been a few weeks since I actually saw Elysium in the cinema and I have been lazy and not written about it until now. But here we are with Neill Blomkamp, Matt Damon and Sharlto Copley. We have an action packed science fiction that concurrently plays on the prescient themes of economic inequality and hero-saves-the-world daring-do. Those are, as I shall discuss, fundamentally contradictory and symbolic of the muddled message at the very heart of the script. There will be spoilers, but then how else can I discuss the meat of the film.

Roughly speaking Damon is a former convict looking to set his life in order working in a factory that builds androids. But he is then the victim of an accident, leaving him with only a few days to live. He must get to Elysium and cure himself with the magic machines they have up there on this distant satellite. Meanwhile Jodie Foster is desperate to preserve her beautiful privileged home from the dirty vermin smouldering on Earth. The wildcard Agent Kruger (Copley) is the baddy who tried to kill everyone.

It's a moderately pleasing picture with brilliantly realised VFX (as one would expect for a big budget) and photographically engrossing combat scenes. Matt Damon is Mr.Consistency once more as the ailing central character Max Da Costa desperately in need of medical salvation from a near-fatal nuclear exposure, who bumps his childhood sweetheart Frey Santiago (Alice Braga) and her sickly daughter; Copley is sufficiently creepy to play the villain Kruger and that irrepressible South African accent is superb the whole way through; and Foster is as sternly matriarchal and ruthless as she needed to be for her role as Delacourt, the Secretary of Defence charged with defending the privileged satellite world of Elysium. 

As for the politics - and one could hardly argue this is not a political film considering the flagrant subject matter of wealth disparity - things are less convincing. I'm not sure how deep and serious Blomkamp's socio-political convictions were for Elysium but the general message has been tragically garbled in favour of superficial plot twists. The concept of a literal partition (i.e. space) between rich and poor is potentially thought-provoking. It is an exaggerated and partisan view of a future society, completely eliminating the bourgeoisie (something Marx would have taken issue with), but nonetheless interesting. Exaggeration is absolutely fine if it is deliberately employed to make a greater, overarching observation about the imbalance of monetary distribution in the modern world. But it wasn't. It was just a cool way of making Da Costa have to fight the evil guys with cool futuristic weapons in a standard quest storyline.

To question Elysium further we would have to examine the motives behind each of the main characters and understand why it is they want to reach Elysium. Max Da Costa wants to heal himself on one of Elysium's wizard medical capsules; Frey Santiago wants to heal her daughter from leukaemia; Kruger wants to supplant the Elysium government and rule as an autonomous figure in luxury. In short, all central characters have no concept of a greater liberation of mankind from the suppression of the rich, but strive forwards with selfish goals in mind. That there is an eventual emancipation of the underprivileged is tacked on at the end as a way of justifying the selfish ambitions that had driven Da Costa and Santiago thus far. When we remember that the wealthy citizens of Elysium don't even turn out to be the bad guys the message becomes ever more confused. Delacourt and the other misguided few are rendered just as victimised as their social underlings by Kruger's callous opportunism. Blomkamp really missed a chance to make some seriously relevant social statements pertaining to the prevalent economic inequality of our world. Elysium's political message is frighteningly flippant - a once pure message has been strangled by the desire to make a good story. 

Should I forget political morality and just take the movie at face value? Possibly... but no. Cinema is the perfect platform for debates about the global problems of our modern society. It's strange that a deficiency in care and thought was allowed to pass considering the liberal centre left leanings of those who work in cinema and the arts (obviously, I'm talking about the creative types not the corporate suits). Alas, the fundamentals of Elysium will forever remain unresolved. Visually it's great though, and the world on Elysium is gorgeously idyllic.