Sofia Coppola is one cool cat. She’s
attractive, sartorially elegant and best friends with Kim Gordon. Coppola has
belied the cinematic royalty of her surname and forged an independent career
built on her talent and auteur eye. She has become a director to be prized and
respected, and I always look forward to her newest work. But The Bling Ring.
Based on the gang of teenagers who were so bedazzled by their celebrity idols
that they burgled their houses, Coppola prods a fictional magnifying glass into
the lives of those juveniles. Young people in thrall to shallow public figures
of the celebrity culture, is a timely subject to explore. Coppola’s keen eye
for pertinent subject matter is to be commended but the execution, not so much.
Her writing (as with all her films Coppola wrote and directed) is lacking a
sentimental depth, an incisiveness that such a complex topic needs.
There’s no doubt that this is a rare
misfire in an otherwise critically successful career. Naturally the focus is on
the teenagers’ obsession with robbing the Hollywood homes of Paris Hilton,
Miranda Kerr etc, but there are but there are so many thematic bases that
Coppola touches on without ever really devoting sufficient time or space to fully
develop. There is an unrequited romance at the centre of the group between Marc
(Israel Broussard) and Rebecca (Katie Chang) that is never developed or
resolved, merely hinted at; similarly the technology aspect of Facebook and the
sharing culture of other social networking is fingered without ever really
imparting much comment beyond acknowledging its presence in these people’s
lives, though the significance of selfies is craftily accomplished and amusingly
prominent.
The role Emma Watson plays is fascinating and
problematic. There’s no doubt that she is the star of the cast, and likely to
pull in a younger and more female audience for Coppola, yet plays neither of
the two central roles. She is Nicki Moore a free floating rich girl who picks
and chooses elements of bogus spirituality to counterbalance the voracity with
which she engages in male flirtation. But there is too little background insight
into her character for the amount of camera time she gets. To be blunt I suspect
that the reason Moore is given as many lines as she has is because it is Emma
Watson who is playing her. Simple as that.
Maybe those criticisms are a little harsh.
There are a couple of dynamite shots: the bit in Megan Fox’s room where Sam
(Taissa Farmiga) finds a gun and playfully points at an agitated Marc is
brilliantly written, brilliantly acted and brilliantly directed. It’s an
intense menacing piece of cinema that sits incongruous with the black humour
everywhere else. And the music does, as ever on a Coppola movie, work
excellently well. In the same way the My Bloody Valentine/Kevin Shields iridescence
encapsulated the alien loneliness in Lost In Translation, so the
reckless and feckless characters revel in the brash hip hop of M.I.A. and Azealia
Banks, and Sleigh Bells’ raucous crunk.
The Bling Ring is not necessarily a bad film, it just doesn’t capture the ills of
modern society as effectively as one feels Sofia Coppola could. Bones of
contention arise out of frustration rather than scorn. There is a prevailing style
and the celebrity guests appearances – Hilton, Kirsten Dunst, Audrina Patridge (must
confess I had never heard of her before) – lend a veneer of authenticity. But
the dialogue between the gang whilst in the process of the burglaries is so
flighty and irritating, and the dangers of drugs and alcohol are so easily cast
aside and meaningless. Yes I know that is the whole point of the movie, but it
feels too contrived without the tenderness of narrative to delve beyond the
aesthetic.
No comments:
Post a Comment